If there is no evidence that this is a "revision or updating" of the earlier edition, then 25.2B would not apply. I believe the relevant rule would be 25.3B, which prefers "the title proper of the original edition" (in this case, the edition published a year earlier).

Ed Jones
National University (San Diego)

-----Original Message-----
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of john g marr
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 2:04 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Uniform title authority record needed

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Michael Borries wrote:

> So far as I can make out from the records, Reuel Golden's 
> Photojournalism, 1855 to the present : editor's choice (LCCN 2005033861) 
> was published in Great Britain a year earlier as Witness : the world's 
> greatest news photographers.

  AACR2 25.1A mentions the need to use uniform titles as partially 
dependent on "1) how well the work is known, 2) how many manefestations of 
the work are involved." Therein lies one distinction between Shakespeare 
and Golden.

  AACR2 25.2B says in part "Relate editions not connected by uniform titles 
by giving the title of the earlier edition in a note in the entry for the 
later edition [etc.]."

  A single "edition" is defined in AARC2 in part as "copies ... issued by 
the same entity."

  Thus: issues by different publishers, especially under different titles, 
are considered to be different "editions", so 25.2B applies when 25.1A is 
not significant.

  John G. Marr
  Univ. of New Mexico
  Albuquerque, NM 87131
  [log in to unmask]
  [log in to unmask]

     **There are only 2 kinds of thinking: "out of the box" and "outside
the box."

Opinions belong exclusively to the individuals expressing them, but
sharing is permitted.