 |
 |
I have 2 comments about this. 1. The PREMIS Editorial Committee is working on some changes to rights to be able to include rights statements in addition to copyright, license and statute under a new container called otherRightsInformation. A draft of those changes will be made available next week for the PIG to review. 1. I am doing some work to put additional controlled vocabularies from PREMIS into the id.loc.gov system. This will be helpful if there is general agreement that these additional terms are useful and should be included. If there are others that people are using please let me know. Rebecca Rebecca S. Guenther [log in to unmask] On Dec 8, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Peter Van Garderen wrote: > Hi Mark, > > We added support for PREMIS rights records in ICA-AtoM 1.2 (released last week). After some analysis (and normalization of existing restrictions from current users), we decided to add two terms to the default terms in the rights statement bases controlled vocabulary: > > 1) Copyright > 2) License > 3) Statute > > & > > 4) Policy (institution-specific policies, e.g. no public access to images containing child nudity) > > 5) Donor (i.e. specific restrictions/permissions placed on the resources by the donor) > > Cheers, > > --peter > > http://code.google.com/p/qubit-toolkit/source/browse/trunk/data/fixtures/taxonomyTerms.yml#1040 > > > On 11-12-08 01:04 PM, Mark A. Matienzo wrote: >> We are looking at identifying terms or controlled vocabularies for >> rights statement bases. In particular, we're looking to find examples >> of rights statements expressed in PREMIS that relate to permissions or >> restrictions based on institutional policy. Most examples I've seen in >> the wild thus far only use one of the three suggested values included >> in the PREMIS Data Dictionary. >> >> Mark A. Matienzo >> Technical Architect, ArchivesSpace >> http://archivesspace.org/ > > -- > Peter Van Garderen > President/Systems Archivist > Artefactual Systems Inc. > http://artefactual.com > 604.527.2056