 |
 |
Thanks Steven. Sent from my iPad On May 30, 2012, at 5:42 PM, "Mark Ehlert" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Culbertson, Rebecca <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> At the PCC Ops meeting in 2011, there was strong preference to keep using >> the provider-neutral model for the time being even when all else in a record >> was RDA. > > Any word on non-electronic reproductions (photocopies, microfilm, > facsimiles, etc.)? > > There was a paper issued by LC(?) a couple years ago on a proposed > move away from LCRI 1.11A and toward AACR2/RDA practice. Though LC > was supposed to have made a decision on this point either before their > RDA Day One announcement or before the day itself, none has been > forthcoming, at least up to now. Will PCC follow LC practice when > it's made? Or forge their own path? > > -- > Mark K. Ehlert Minitex > Coordinator University of Minnesota > Bibliographic & Technical 15 Andersen Library > Services (BATS) Unit 222 21st Avenue South > Phone: 612-624-0805 Minneapolis, MN 55455-0439 > <http://www.minitex.umn.edu/>