In 6JSC/LC/21, I wondered why “i.e.” was being changed to “e.g.” Changing from “i.e.” to “e.g.” makes the two terms undefined, since “e.g.” introduces an example rather than a definition.
The JSC has made three more RDA proposals available on their website:
6JSC/LC/20 Revisions to RDA Chapter 6 to treat "Selections" as a work attribute
6JSC/LC/21 Clarification of leaves and pages (18.104.22.168 and Glossary)
6JSC/LC/22 Revisions to Date Associated with the Person (9.3) when recording more than a year alone
CC:DA will need to respond to these proposals in advance of the November JSC meeting. While no specific deadlines have yet been established for CC:DA feedback, I would be happy to forward any comments from PCC members for consideration.
Please send your comments directly to me and not to the PCC list; I will contribute them to the CC:DA wiki. If you have an opportunity to comment on these papers through multiple CC:DA liaisons or voting members, please select just one of us to contribute on your behalf.
Please contact me if you have any questions. I look forward to hearing your thoughts!
PCC liaison to CC:DA
Head, Special Resources Cataloging / Music Cataloger
University of Maryland