Print

Print


As I've mentioned before, I believe the Reiner/Respighi SACD is the most successful of that entire series.

db



>________________________________
> From: Roderic G Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask] 
>Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 4:25:22 PM
>Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] High-end turntable
> 
>Well, turntables are a necessary evil when it comes to recovering those blessed sounds hidden on the grooves of our favorite recordings, but I'm really blown away by the newly remastered RCA "Living Stereo" SACD series.  I've been adding them to my library with much satisfaction through Amazon business partners with very reasonable prices.  It's like a whole new respect for those recordings which I never bought because of the lesser quality LP releases.  They just didn't sound good to me.  I did buy the reel to reel releases with quite a bit of satisfaction, and my recent purchase of the Reiner/Chicago Respighi "Pines/Fountains" and Debussy "La Mer" (SACD #82876/71614-2) blows me away with the increased sound field definition, dynamic range and sweetness as well as drive of the strings, too.  I'm glad I've lived long enough to hear and pay tribute to these recordings and artists.   What a treasure trove with more yet to come as long as my budget
>holds out.
>
>--- On Wed, 9/19/12, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] High-end turntable
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Date: Wednesday, September 19, 2012, 12:37 PM
>
>Hi Carl:
>
>You are right about the Philips with floor vibrations. Cheapo feet are the reason. I use an old IBM typewriter pad that used to sit under the Selectric typewriters so they wouldn't vibrate a desk. Plus it's on top of a heavy file cabinet sitting on a concrete slab, nowhere near any woofers. The touch-sensitive buttons were a koolio feature in the early 80's (along with big hair and "Flashdance"), but they get very insensitive over time. I now have to blow on my fingertips before operating them or they won't sense any touch. I'm not dead, but I do have dry hands and fingers. My mother (the original owner) had the same problem with those buttons. At her house, the turntable was in a cabinet that had cement under it and the speakers were in a different room, so no vibration feedback problems.
>
>In the case of both the Philips and the Technics servo systems, there's plenty of feedback to make speed accuracy and pitch accuracy if the system is functioning. One system that could get tripped up was Denon, which had two tape heads and a magnetic ring inside the platter as its system. That's only about one data point per second (2x 33 1/3 per minute), and some people can hear the system adjust speed on tracking-challenge stuff like fff to ppp on a good classical recording. I saw that tape-head and fixed magnet system used in one other place -- on AutoTec tape decks, that's how motion-sensing was done. Ampex used a light source, strobe wheel and light-detector on the AG-440C. I was taught old-school about tape spooling, and don't trust any motion sensing system. I always "rock and roll" to a dead stop, then hit stop. Diverging ...
>
>Anyway, as I've said numerous times, there is only so much "perfection" you're going to eek out of the _vast_ majority of LP records. Even a modest modern system (due to low-noise phono preamps and the general availability of decently compliant cartridges) will reveal how much rumble and hum and hiss is baked into the "golden era" records. Listen on headphones and it all hangs out. The early Westrex stereo cutters were tough beasts to wrangle, and the old lathes were rumbling to varying degrees of audibility. Plus the old tape machines had relatively high noise floors, old tapes hissed, etc. The problem with most "audiophile" records is that the content sucks and isn't worth hearing, performance-wise and/or recording-wise. Some reissue LPs of more recent vintage are wonderful exceptions to that admittedly blanket statement.
>
>-- Tom Fine
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Carl" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: "Tom Fine" <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 3:11 PM
>Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] High-end turntable
>
>
>> Pardon the imprecise language, professor. I mean to say the best playback of LP I have yet heard. :)
>> 
>> You mean the Philips model that used touch-sensitive buttons? I had one of those around 1978. It was good, but the suspension was very sensitive to footfalls. Speed is not the only thing that's important, but it should be right. The original Rega Planar 3s ran fast! (Purposely?) On how many TTs can you hear the pitch go up after a loud passage? You're right about the Slovak stuff - they're toys. I'd rather have what I think you've got - Technics? But then it would be fun to put yours next to a mid-range Rega, and compare them for overall tunage. The Technics would probably win for value, but of course, that's a very personal evaluation.
>> 
>> Small things mean a lot with this black magic stuff, and they cost. The tonearm is important and so is the way it interacts with the rest of the structure. The fewer you sell, the more expensive each is, forming a commercial feedback loop. I know from working in high-end retail, that nobody actually pays $170,000 or $35,000 for one of these things, unless the buyer's favorite charity is his audio dealer. On the Clearaudio, the customer could demand a 25% discount and the dealer would still make $15,000. No dealer would say no, right?
>> 
>> Now, the question of value, .... that machine looks absurd. Clearaudio's normal stuff pales in comparison to SME's workmanship, but their stuff generally is better than VPI or others at below 8k (my buddy is a dealer for those makes and others). The SME's price makes some sense given the scope of the market, inherent quality, and the performance you get. Seriously. I have owned (of the good ones) Thorens, Luxman, Oracle, Micro Seiki, VPI, Nottingham, and now for some years the modest little SME 10. They're all good, all different, and there is a hierarchy of reproduction quality that, to me, is worthwhile.
>> 
>> In high-end audio, high cost also is its own priority. It is sometimes money for nothing and when it is shysterism, that's wrong. I'm okay with your populist sentiment, Tom. I've spent most of life on a shoestring and right now Micky and I are literally below poverty income - only partially by choice. So far, it has made sense to me to have a better TT than a car. Hope that doesn't change!
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Sep 19, 2012 1:17 PM
>>> To: Carl <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] High-end turntable
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Aside from obvious things like unacceptably high rumble, speed inaccuracy and tonearm resonances,
>>> which should only occur on cheapo junk among modern-production turntables, what exactly is the
>>> "sound" of a turntable? Shouldn't the "sound" of a turntable be the sound of the cartridge with good
>>> design rendering rumble and mechanical resonances inaudible and perfect speed accuracy eliminating
>>> wow and flutter?
>>> 
>>> By the way, use any objective test record (Analogue Productions, Shure, the old Command test record,
>>> CBS Labs, etc) and a frequency counter and see how inaccurate the speed is on the lower-end
>>> "audiophile" belt-drive turntables. I discovered this problem on a MusicHall turntable and then
>>> measured the same problems on all of those similar turntables made in Eastern Europe. I think the
>>> problem is a combination of a cheapo motor and a cheapo bearing, which makes speed accuracy
>>> impossible without a platter too heavy for the cheapo motor to move. The old Thoren belt-drives had
>>> it right -- if you're going to go that route (and I prefer direct-drive in the first place), then
>>> you better have a massive platter and a precision bearing. Philips had a clever system that they got
>>> down to very low price points by using a non-exotic platter with a good but non-exotic bearing and a
>>> DC servo motor driving the belt, so the motor would make up for whatever the consequences with a
>>> light platter. I've got one of those Philips turntables and it measures speed-accurate like a
>>> Technics 1200 direct-drive. Both have very low flutter characteristics too.
>>> 
>>> As for tonearm resonances, that's another problem with the low-end "audiophile" tables coming out of
>>> Europe. Those hollow-metal tonearms very audibly resonate with many cartridges, especially on
>>> deeply-cut records and on warped records. Plus the premative string-and-weight anti-skate
>>> "mechanism" is a joke. For the same money, the Chinese Technics-knockoffs will give you better speed
>>> accuracy, a better-designed (but not necessarily better-executed) anti-skate mechanism and, if you
>>> get a real-deal Technics heavy rubber platter mat instead of a felt "skate mat" typically included,
>>> you get equal or lower rumble.
>>> 
>>> -- Tom Fine
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carl" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 12:48 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] High-end turntable
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> It's a statement all right, and so is the price. Makes the best record player I've ever heard seem
>>>> cheap. The SME 30 is about $35k. Yes, if I had that kind of money, I'd own one. Better than
>>>> wasting that much cash on an automobile.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Randy Lane <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Sep 19, 2012 11:42 AM
>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>> Subject: [ARSCLIST] High-end turntable
>>>>> 
>>>>> Anyone own, plan to buy, or used one of these yet?
>>>>> 
>>>>> *http://tinyurl.com/5w2zw7*
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>
>
>