Print

Print


This was also sent earlier but never got posted.


----- Forwarded Message -----
>From: Dave Burnham <[log in to unmask]>
>To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]> 
>Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 9:39:11 PM
>Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] truth or myth -- RCA claims about first digital recording
> 
>Well I think if there had never been a Mr. Prince, (I've momentarily forgotten his first name, Charles? George?), Columbia records probably would have been out of business before the end of the acoustic era. 
>
>db
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On 2012-11-28, at 2:49 PM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Mike. Do you (or anyone else on-list) know what was, in fact, the most-recorded conductor? As I wrote before, Dorati and Karajan come to mind, but maybe some obscure guy laboring for budget-priced classics did more? Maybe Kostelonitz (sp?)?
>> 
>> -- Tom Fine
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gray, Mike" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 2:27 PM
>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] truth or myth -- RCA claims about first digital recording
>> 
>> 
>>> Hype on both counts - Gene made violin records in the late 20s, though not so far as I know acoustic ones. After he got hooked up with Arthur Judson and became a conductor, he wanted everyone to forget he ever made them.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Mike
>
>
>