This was also sent earlier but never got posted. ----- Forwarded Message ----- >From: Dave Burnham <[log in to unmask]> >To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]> >Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 9:39:11 PM >Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] truth or myth -- RCA claims about first digital recording > >Well I think if there had never been a Mr. Prince, (I've momentarily forgotten his first name, Charles? George?), Columbia records probably would have been out of business before the end of the acoustic era. > >db > >Sent from my iPhone > >On 2012-11-28, at 2:49 PM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Thanks Mike. Do you (or anyone else on-list) know what was, in fact, the most-recorded conductor? As I wrote before, Dorati and Karajan come to mind, but maybe some obscure guy laboring for budget-priced classics did more? Maybe Kostelonitz (sp?)? >> >> -- Tom Fine >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gray, Mike" <[log in to unmask]> >> To: <[log in to unmask]> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 2:27 PM >> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] truth or myth -- RCA claims about first digital recording >> >> >>> Hype on both counts - Gene made violin records in the late 20s, though not so far as I know acoustic ones. After he got hooked up with Arthur Judson and became a conductor, he wanted everyone to forget he ever made them. >>> >>> >>> Mike > > >