Print

Print


My interpretation is that Plays from Black Australia is a Creative Work which has relationships to four other Works (Dreamers, Murras, Coorday and Keepers) the relationships indicate these four works form part of a larger work.

You can have instances of Plays from Black Australia, but also instances of the other works if they have been published in their own right.

But of course I'm guilty of speculation - it's just how I'd personally do it based on what has been presented in the document :)

Owen

Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: [log in to unmask]
Telephone: 0121 288 6936

On 26 Nov 2012, at 17:26, "LE PAPE, Philippe" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Le 26/11/2012 17:04, Owen Stephens a �crit :
[log in to unmask]" type="cite"> Under the Work description on p10
"Works can relate to other Works reflecting, for example, part / whole relationships."

I guess this is what we are talking about here?

Not quite. Rather this, which is an anthology of 4 plays (example taken from RDA 25.1.1.3):

Contains: Davis, Jack, 1917�2000. Dreamers
Contains: Johnson, Eva. Murras
Contains: Walley, Richard. Coordah
Contains: Maza, Bob, 1939�2000. Keepers
Resource described: Plays from Black Australia / Jack Davis, Eva Johnson, Richard Walley, Bob Maza ; with an introduction by Justine Saunders.

Which BIBFRAME Work is Plays from Black Australia an instance of? Or is it a BIBFRAME Work in its own right?
I suppose we'll have an answer to that...

Ph.


[log in to unmask]" type="cite">

Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: [log in to unmask]
Telephone: 0121 288 6936

On 26 Nov 2012, at 15:34, Diane Hillmann <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Philippe:

I had the same response, immediately thinking of things like collected stories (single or multiple authors) and serial issues. These are certainly fairly common in bibliographic metadata, and were not well handled in MARC or MODS. The FRBR model, though admittedly a complex beast, accommodated these materials, and gave some hope that there could be ways of handling those kinds of materials in ways that a machine could understand, rather than (as usual) depending on the human user to figure it out.

Diane Hillmann

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 26, 2012, at 9:13 AM, "LE PAPE, Philippe" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Dear Everybody,

Colleagues have already expressed their concern about the vanishing of FRBR Expression entity in Zepheira's "BIBFRAME" model, but I was rather puzzled by this:

"Each BIBFRAME Instance is an instance of one and,only one BIBFRAME Work." P. 10.

What about (FRBR) Manifestations embodying more than one (FRBR) Work then? Will there be something like compound (BIBFRAME) instances? Or will the aggregation be done at the (BIBFRAME) Work level?

Ph.
--
[log in to unmask]" type="application/x-apple-msg-attachment" border="0" height="65" width="200">
Philippe Le Pape
Mission Normalisation
227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala
34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5
T�l.  33 (0)4 67 54 84 67
Fax  33 (0)4 67 54 84 14



--
<logo.gif>
Philippe Le Pape
Mission Normalisation
227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala
34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5
T�l.  33 (0)4 67 54 84 67
Fax  33 (0)4 67 54 84 14