Michael Ayres wrote: > Why would anyone have a lower level cataloging assistant messing > with the substance of a catalog record -- other than maybe something > like copy/pasting a call number as needed?! Those staff who would be > doing any substantive editing of a bibliographic record should > understand the structure, and everybody else should not be touching > those records! I don't see a valid case for dumbing down the system in > this way. There could be many valid reasons for having various levels of staff work on records in various ways--adding notes, subject headings, names, etc. for any number of reasons. I don't understand why we want to keep it difficult for people to understand what the data in the record mean. > > ... There should be no reason for us to require student assistants helping > out in the Catalog Dept. to learn the MARC tags. > > Well, how about the possibility of those students actually becoming > interested in the library profession? I seem to recall being completely > intrigued with such knowledge a 'few' years ago (few is relative). So we should keep things difficult and expensive just so we have something mysterious that will capture someone's interest in a career? That doesn't seem like very good justification to me. Also, I have a hard time believing that having natural-language input forms for metadata will be a barrier to getting people interested in librarianship. Moreover, there is a big difference between 1) *requiring* the use of the MARC format for everyone doing cataloging, and 2) prohibiting everyone from learning more about the underlying metadata structures. I hope my previous posts on this topic didn't give the impression that I was espousing the latter; nothing could be further from the truth! Kevin M. Randall Principal Serials Cataloger Northwestern University Library [log in to unmask] (847) 491-2939 Proudly wearing the sensible shoes since 1978!