 |
 |
Let me do this again (from scratch, even). The following are the number of records that have the listed elements, out of 289,294,984 records processed, as of 1 January 2013 in WorldCat: 700 $4: 14,229,291 or 4.92% of the total 700 $e: 9,904,536 or 3.42% of the total Roy On 1/18/13 1/18/13 � 10:33 AM, "Ross Singer" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > On Jan 18, 2013, at 1:11 PM, "Godsey-Bell, Connie F. (LNG-DAY)" > <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> What percent of the total do the total occurrences represent? > > And what number of unique records have a 700 with a $4 or an $e? > > -Ross. >> >> Thanks, >> Connie Godsey-Bell, >> Editor >> LexisNexis >> >> From: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum >> [mailto:[log in to unmask] <http://LISTSERV.LOC.GOV> ] On Behalf Of >> Tennant,Roy >> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 12:42 PM >> To: [log in to unmask] >> Subject: Re: [BIBFRAME] Input screens >> >> On 1/18/13 1/18/13 � 9:24 AM, "Ross Singer" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> How often, on aggregate, is the 100 or 700 $4 or $e used? Since I've parsed >> a lot of MARC records, I can tell you. Not much (and the inconsistency of >> the $e makes this even less useful). >> >> I can tell you exactly, as of December 1, 2012 in WorldCat: >> >> Total number of records: 287,229,344 >> Total occurrences of a 700 field: 80,731,356 >> Total occurrences of 700 $4: 24,908,408 >> Total occurrences of a 700 $e: 14,117,538 >> >> Roy >> >>