Print

Print


Let me do this again (from scratch, even). The following are the number of
records that have the listed elements, out of 289,294,984 records processed,
as of 1 January 2013 in WorldCat:

700 $4: 14,229,291 or 4.92% of the total
700 $e: 9,904,536 or 3.42% of the total

Roy 

On 1/18/13 1/18/13  10:33 AM, "Ross Singer" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On Jan 18, 2013, at 1:11 PM, "Godsey-Bell, Connie F. (LNG-DAY)"
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> What percent of the total do the total occurrences represent?
> 
> And what number of unique records have a 700 with a $4 or an $e?
> 
> -Ross.
>>  
>> Thanks,
>> Connie Godsey-Bell,
>> Editor
>> LexisNexis
>>  
>> From: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask] <http://LISTSERV.LOC.GOV> ] On Behalf Of
>> Tennant,Roy
>> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 12:42 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [BIBFRAME] Input screens
>>  
>> On 1/18/13 1/18/13  9:24 AM, "Ross Singer" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> How often, on aggregate, is the 100 or 700 $4 or $e used?  Since I've parsed
>> a lot of MARC records, I can tell you.  Not much (and the inconsistency of
>> the $e makes this even less useful).
>> 
>> I can tell you exactly, as of December 1, 2012 in WorldCat:
>> 
>> Total number of records: 287,229,344
>> Total occurrences of a 700 field: 80,731,356
>> Total occurrences of 700 $4: 24,908,408
>> Total occurrences of a 700 $e: 14,117,538
>> 
>> Roy
>> 
>>