Richard,
It is actually a long-standing NACO Program guideline that is still applicable in the RDA transition period:
Unless there is a clear error in a 1XX, leave the 1XX alone to minimize the amount of bibliographic file maintenance in library catalogs.
The scope of 1XX "errors" is wider now because of RDA instructions, but the basic NACO Program guideline to avoid 1XX changes if at all possible remains the
same.
So, a couple of examples of "leave the 1XX alone" at the time of re-coding to RDA:
1)
AACR2 heading without a birth date, but the date was subsequently discovered (e.g., recorded in a 670) :
accept the heading as RDA -- do not add that birth date to the 1XX. (You could add the date(s) to the 046 field however);
2) AACR2 heading with a fuller form of name in $q that would not be required under RDA (no conflict) :
accept the heading as RDA -- leave the subfield $q in the 1XX.
About the 50 Cent $c (Musician) record (no2003002159):
The AACR2 1XX was 50 Cent
ǂc (Musician) at the time Chuck (or someone else at Carnegie) established
the heading on Jan. 9, 2003.
Based on the NACO guideline to leave the 1XX alone unless it is incorrect, and on RDA 9.2.2.21 and RDA 9.19.1.2, the AACR2 1XX
50 Cent
ǂc (Musician) is acceptable under RDA, and no 1XX change is necessary at
the time of the re-coding.
Paul
Paul Frank
Cooperative Programs Section
Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division
Library of Congress
101 Independence Ave., SE
Washington, DC 20540-4230
202-707-1570
[log in to unmask]
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Moore, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:06 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Order of subfields in RDA NARs for personal names
It would. I'm sure there is an LC guideline that says 1XX should not be altered in RDA review, if the construction is acceptable in RDA. So neither should the
qualifier be changed, nor a date be added. perhaps Paul can confirm, as I can't lay my hands on the link at this moment (it's 7 a.m. here and I have not yet had my first cup of tea).
Regards
Richard
_________________________
Authority Control Team Manager
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of John Hostage
Sent: 19 February 2013 21:17
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Order of subfields in RDA NARs for personal names
Wouldn’t the heading for 50 Cent be considered RDA “acceptable” as is? Moreover, in today’s multicultural world, it’s getting harder and harder to say what
does or does not convey the idea of a person.
------------------------------------------
John Hostage
Authorities and Database Integrity Librarian
Harvard Library--Information and Technical Services
Langdell Hall 194
Cambridge, MA 02138
[log in to unmask]
+(1)(617) 495-3974 (voice)
+(1)(617) 496-4409 (fax)
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Herrold, Charles
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 15:14
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Order of subfields in RDA NARs for personal names
This should have been qualified with (Rapper or Rap musician) to begin with. (It’s my record, so I can say what I want about it!) However, if he can now
be considered “entrepreneur, investor and actor” as well, then my third alternative below is probably the best one. The first version of the AR looked like this:
010 no2003002159
040 PPi-MA
ǂb eng
ǂc PPi-MA
1000 50 Cent
ǂc (Musician)
4000 Fifty Cent
ǂc (Musician)
4001 Jackson, C.
ǂq (Curtis)
4001 Jackson, Curtis
670 Music from and inspired by the motion picture 8 mile [SR] p2002:
ǂb container
(50 Cent) insert (C. Jackson)
670 All music guide WWW site, Jan. 8, 2003
ǂb (50 Cent; b. Curtis Jackson,
Queens, NY; rapper)
670 OCLC database, Jan. 8, 2003
ǂb (hdgs.: 50 Cent (Musician); 50 Cent,
rapper)
More worrisome is what to do in upgrading this to RDA. There are almost too many possibilities:
50 Cent
ǂc (Rapper)
50 Cent
ǂc (Rapper),
ǂd 1975-
50 Cent,
ǂd 1975-
I think we’ve established, mainly though Richard Moore’s thoughtful statements, that $c would precede $d. But the question remains: with a birth date
clearly identifying “50 Cent” as a person, is the additional of Occupation even necessary:
010 no 00088820
040 RPB-M
ǂb eng
ǂc RPB-M
ǂd PPi-MA
ǂd DLC
ǂe rda
ǂd ICrlF
046
ǂf 1971
1000 Chali 2na,
ǂd 1971-
372 Music industry
373 Jurassic 5
374 Rapper
375 male
377 eng
4000 Chali2na,
ǂd 1971-
4001 2na, Chali
4000 Chali2na
ǂc (Musician)
4001 Stewart, Charles,
ǂd 1971-
4001 Tuna, Charlie
4000 Chali 2na
ǂc (Musician)
ǂw nnea
I haven’t been consistent myself. I’d like to be, going forward at least.
Chuck Herrold
Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Carolyn S
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 11:23 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Order of subfields in RDA NARs for personal names
Should 50 Cent be qualified by (Rapper) rather than by (Musician)? Wikipedia lists 50 Cent as being a rapper, entrepreneur, investor and actor. (My staff
have been debating this for the last 15 minutes.)
Are these qualifications up for discussion?
Thanks,
Carolyn Gonzalez
Head of Technical Services
Sueltenfuss Library
Our Lady of the Lake University
411 SW 24th St
San Antonio, TX 78249
(210) 434-6711 x8165
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Mark K. Ehlert
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 9:21 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Order of subfields in RDA NARs for personal names
Herrold, Charles <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I’ve done one somewhat like this—not very tidy—and perhaps incorrectly:
1000
KJ-52 ǂc (Rapper),
ǂd 1975-
[changed from KJ52 (Rapper)]
A question on this point came up during our RDA in NACO training in November. Here's the question I posed to Paul Frank along with his response:
5. Additions made to names that do not evoke "person-ness": since LC-PCC PS 9.19.1.3 asks for birth/death dates in personal name access points regardless of conflict, it seems this is also expected for those names that require Profession/Occupation element
data to clarify the person-ness of someone (RDA 9.19.1.2). Following this, we would then have:
100 0- 50 Cent $c (Musician), $d 1975-
Is this correct?
PF: Yes, this is correct.
--
Mark K. Ehlert Minitex
Coordinator University of Minnesota
Digitization, Cataloging & 15 Andersen Library
Metadata Education (DCME) 222 21st Avenue South
Phone: 612-624-0805 Minneapolis, MN 55455-0439
<http://www.minitex.umn.edu/>
This email message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.� Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by anyone other than the intended individual or entity is prohibited without prior approval.� If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately.