Should 50 Cent be qualified by (Rapper) rather than by (Musician)?  Wikipedia lists 50 Cent as being a rapper, entrepreneur, investor and actor.  (My staff have been debating this for the last 15 minutes.)


Are these qualifications up for discussion? 



Carolyn Gonzalez

Head of Technical Services

Sueltenfuss Library

Our Lady of the Lake University

411 SW 24th St

San Antonio, TX  78249


(210) 434-6711 x8165


From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mark K. Ehlert
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 9:21 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Order of subfields in RDA NARs for personal names


Herrold, Charles <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

   I’ve done one somewhat like this—not very tidy—and perhaps incorrectly:


1000 KJ-52 ǂc (Rapper), ǂd 1975-  [changed from KJ52 (Rapper)]

A question on this point came up during our RDA in NACO training in November.  Here's the question I posed to Paul Frank along with his response:

5. Additions made to names that do not evoke "person-ness": since LC-PCC PS asks for birth/death dates in personal name access points regardless of conflict, it seems this is also expected for those names that require Profession/Occupation element data to clarify the person-ness of someone (RDA  Following this, we would then have:

 100 0- 50 Cent $c (Musician), $d 1975-

Is this correct?

PF: Yes, this is correct.

Mark K. Ehlert                 Minitex
Coordinator                    University of Minnesota
Digitization, Cataloging &     15 Andersen Library

  Metadata Education (DCME)    222 21st Avenue South
Phone: 612-624-0805            Minneapolis, MN 55455-0439