 |
 |
Should 50 Cent be qualified by (Rapper) rather than by (Musician)? Wikipedia lists 50 Cent as being a rapper, entrepreneur, investor and actor. (My staff
have been debating this for the last 15 minutes.)
Are these qualifications up for discussion?
Thanks,
Carolyn Gonzalez
Head of Technical Services
Sueltenfuss Library
Our Lady of the Lake University
411 SW 24th St
San Antonio, TX 78249
(210) 434-6711 x8165
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Mark K. Ehlert
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 9:21 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Order of subfields in RDA NARs for personal names
Herrold, Charles <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I’ve done one somewhat like this—not very tidy—and perhaps incorrectly:
1000
KJ-52 ǂc (Rapper), ǂd 1975- [changed from KJ52 (Rapper)]
A question on this point came up during our RDA in NACO training in November. Here's the question I posed to Paul Frank along with his response:
5. Additions made to names that do not evoke "person-ness": since LC-PCC PS 9.19.1.3 asks for birth/death dates in personal name access points regardless of conflict, it seems this is also expected for those names that require Profession/Occupation element
data to clarify the person-ness of someone (RDA 9.19.1.2). Following this, we would then have:
100 0- 50 Cent $c (Musician), $d 1975-
Is this correct?
PF: Yes, this is correct.
--
Mark K. Ehlert Minitex
Coordinator University of Minnesota
Digitization, Cataloging & 15 Andersen Library
Metadata Education (DCME) 222 21st Avenue South
Phone: 612-624-0805 Minneapolis, MN 55455-0439
<http://www.minitex.umn.edu/>