 |
 |
Herrold, Charles <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I’ve done one somewhat like this—not very tidy—and perhaps > incorrectly:**** > > ** ** > 1000 *KJ-52 ǂc (Rapper), ǂd 1975- [changed from KJ52 (Rapper)]* > A question on this point came up during our RDA in NACO training in November. Here's the question I posed to Paul Frank along with his response: 5. Additions made to names that do not evoke "person-ness": since LC-PCC PS 9.19.1.3 asks for birth/death dates in personal name access points regardless of conflict, it seems this is also expected for those names that require Profession/Occupation element data to clarify the person-ness of someone (RDA 9.19.1.2). Following this, we would then have: 100 0- 50 Cent $c (Musician), $d 1975- Is this correct? PF: Yes, this is correct. -- Mark K. Ehlert Minitex Coordinator University of Minnesota Digitization, Cataloging & 15 Andersen Library Metadata Education (DCME) 222 21st Avenue South Phone: 612-624-0805 Minneapolis, MN 55455-0439 <http://www.minitex.umn.edu/>