Herrold, Charles <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>     I’ve done one somewhat like this—not very tidy—and perhaps
> incorrectly:****
> ** **
> 1000 *KJ-52 ǂc (Rapper), ǂd 1975-  [changed from KJ52 (Rapper)]*

A question on this point came up during our RDA in NACO training in
November.  Here's the question I posed to Paul Frank along with his

5. Additions made to names that do not evoke "person-ness": since LC-PCC PS asks for birth/death dates in personal name access points
regardless of conflict, it seems this is also expected for those names that
require Profession/Occupation element data to clarify the person-ness of
someone (RDA  Following this, we would then have:

 100 0- 50 Cent $c (Musician), $d 1975-

Is this correct?

PF: Yes, this is correct.

Mark K. Ehlert                 Minitex
Coordinator                    University of Minnesota
Digitization, Cataloging &     15 Andersen Library
  Metadata Education (DCME)    222 21st Avenue South
Phone: 612-624-0805            Minneapolis, MN 55455-0439