Ross Singer posted:

>The argument for using numeric/letter codes to define the data model is a
>canard, frankly.

Ummm; 130 and 240 are convenient short hand for "uniform title as
main entry" and "uniform title after main entry for filing".

What <bf:term> has been created for these two elements? There seems to
me to be a tension between being short enough for ease, or being long
enough to be explicit.  Some of the RDA 336 content terms and $e
relationship terms are far too long.  I hope that will not be true of
Bibframe element names.

   __       __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask])
  {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://
  ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________