As frustrating as this conversation is for those of us who live in the Linked Data world, I equally appreciate this forum as a way to get libraries thinking more clearly about Linked Data. The solution to most of these problems already exist, but are being ignored.
Sent from my iPad
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:35 PM, stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]>
Because that's what 'immutable' (your word) means. Not changing. Not fixing even the most trivial and obvious of mistakes.
On 07/05/13 11:06, Ford, Kevin wrote:
Does that mean that if a spelling mistake occurs in the RDF for the
-- No. Why would it?
title of this novel, that it's incorrect in perpetuity?
What part of «unquestionably objective "facts"» don't you understand?