Print

Print


I always understood that in BIBFRAME
 - Work == WE
 - Instance == MI

Thanks,
Shlomo

Sent from my iPad

On May 12, 2013, at 8:34, "Vinod Chachra" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

Tami�s comment below raises two points.


1)      In the implementation of FRBR we had to use �super works� to link works together.  I wonder if this will also be necessary in BibFrame to link related works together. At present the only objects that allows different works to be �linked� together are authorities (subjects and creators).  So do we treat �super works� as a different type of authority?

2)      Based on the BibFrame mappings that I have seen, it appears to me that the �instance� in BibFrame  covers both the �expression� and �manifestation� aspects of FRBR.  Is this correct?


Thanks. Vinod.

Vinod Chachra
President and CEO
VTLS inc.
Blacksburg, VA 24060
Phone 540-449-3000

From: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Tami Ezra
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 12:45 AM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [BIBFRAME] Basic question about Work

Hi,

Does the BIBFRAME �work� include different expressions (as in FRBR) � for example different translations? I think not as I would expect a translation to be considered a different �conceptual essence� (albeit a related one) but I haven�t been able to find this stated explicitly.    If I have understood this correctly will it be possible to express links between works � e.g different translations?

Thanks
Tami






Tami Ezra
Senior Business Analyst, URD�
Ex Libris
+972-544419592
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>