On Thu, 16 May 2013 18:20:46 -0700, J. McRee Elrod <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >I gather that Bibframe "works" are RDA works and >expressions. If each translation is its own work, with its own record >(or whatever it is decided to call the work data), then shouldn't the >various translations be related? Will Bibframe have an equivalent of >77X? Maybe the relationship is simply hierarchical: each such translation has the same relationship to the source work? If it's easy to follow that relationship path, then any other linking mechanism is superfluous. Hal Cain Melbourne, Australia [log in to unmask]