> while perhaps some are not a large percentage, they lack of one ISBN
> per instance is very common. Most modern novels apper in both bound
> and paperback forms.
-- This is why the 260 is part of the calculus for splitting a MARC record into a BIBFRAME Work and one of more BIBFRAME Instances.
> On another topic: I gather that Bibframe "works" are RDA works and
> expressions. If each translation is its own work, with its own record
> (or whatever it is decided to call the work data), then shouldn't the
> various translations be related? Will Bibframe have an equivalent of
> 77X?
-- Translations will be related to that which they are a translation of.
Yours,
Kevin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. McRee Elrod [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:21 PM
> To: Ford, Kevin
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [BIBFRAME] What's an instance?
>
> Kevin said:
>
> >I do wonder how common they really are.
>
> while perhaps some are not a large percentage, they lack of one ISBN
> per instance is very common. Most modern novels apper in both bound
> and paperback forms.
>
> The percentage is large enough that the amount of hands on time to
> clean up messes would be daunting.
>
> On another topic: I gather that Bibframe "works" are RDA works and
> expressions. If each translation is its own work, with its own record
> (or whatever it is decided to call the work data), then shouldn't the
> various translations be related? Will Bibframe have an equivalent of
> 77X?
>
>
> __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask])
> {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
> ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
>
