Print

Print


I was actually arguing that I don't think the model of Works and Instances that BIBFRAME has identified is as useful as the FRBR WEMI model. Sorry I wasn't more clear!

Laura

--
Laura Krier
Metadata Analyst
California Digital Library

510-987-0832

On May 21, 2013, at 12:55 PM, "J. McRee Elrod" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


Laura said:

... a user can still request a resource at the Expression level ...

How may one request at the Expression level, since Bibframe has no
Expression level records*?  Some Work level records are actually
Expressions I understand, e.g., a translation?   But wouldn't ILL or
hold requests with Bibframe have to be made using the Work or Instance
record?

I agree that Instance records based on binding is not only a major
departure from long standing practice, but a complication for holds
and ILL requests.

*I'm continuing t use "record" util there is an agreed upon alternative.


  __       __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask])
 {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
 ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________