On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:35 PM, stuart yeates <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:[log in to unmask]" target="_blank"><a href="/cgi-bin/wa?LOGON=A3%3Dind1305%26L%3DBIBFRAME%26E%3Dquoted-printable%26P%3D839498%26B%3D--047d7bf0de88db6a4704dc1681e4%26T%3Dtext%252Fhtml%3B%2520charset%3DISO-8859-1" target="_parent" >[log in to unmask]</a></a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 07/05/13 11:06, Ford, Kevin wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Dear Stuart,<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Does that mean that if a spelling mistake occurs in the RDF for the<br>
title of this novel, that it&#39;s incorrect in perpetuity?<br>
</blockquote>
-- No.  Why would it?<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Because that&#39;s what &#39;immutable&#39; (your word) means. Not changing. Not fixing even the most trivial and obvious of mistakes.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>What part of  «unquestionably objective &quot;facts&quot;» don&#39;t you understand? </div>
<div><br></div><div>As <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/facts/">facts</a>, they obtain; as unquestionable, they are <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/">known infallibly</a>; being objective, they are <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/#WEX">externally justified</a>.  </div>
<div><br></div><div>Misspelling the name of <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/russell/#RTDD">The Author Of Waverley</a> would be absolutely, totally, and in all other ways <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk">inconceivable</a>. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Simon</div></div>