Others have already rightly commented that there is no clear 'right' approach in this case.

 

That being said, I personally prefer the one you suggest as 'not correct.'  For this reason:

The old AACR2 1.1F12 provision for 'noun phrases' did not make it verbatim into RDA 2.4.1.8 (and it isn’t EXACTY the situation you describe, in any case.   But I always found the AACR2 distinction very helpful.  If the data is indicative of the 'nature', it goes in the $b; if it is indicative of the 'role' (more of an 'action'). it goes in $c.  To me, what you describe is more about nature than role (e.g., there's no verb). And while RDA 2.4.1.8 seems to prescribe putting it in with the $c, one could argue (as I do) that there is no s.o.r. to put it in with.

 

Again, there is room to disagree, as some of us obviously do.  Not worth agonizing.  I personally prefer the one you admit to seeing most commonly -- $a : $b

 

As Amy has observed, the key is to get the data in there and make sure it can be found somehow.

 

 

Timothy J. Carlton

Senior Instructor

Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division

Library of Congress

202-707-5323

[log in to unmask]

 

Usual disclaimers apply

 

From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ratliff, Louise
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 5:53 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCCLIST] Question: Named conferences and RDA

 

Hello BIBCO colleagues,

 

I sent this message a week ago to an email address that may no longer be in use, so I am sending it out on the PCC list today.  My question has to do with describing printed conference publications, following FRBR and RDA.  Any advice is welcome.

 

I am struggling with how to describe conference publications using RDA.  First of all, named conferences are treated as creators.  An authorized access point for a conference name would include the relationship designator of “author”  or “creator.” Fine so far, right?

 

So how do I treat a publication with a title page such as this:

 

Book of abstracts

Conference on Minorities, Federalism and Politics in Nigeria,

In honor of Professor G.N. Hembe,

15-18 July 2012.

 

I believe the title proper would be “Book of abstracts.”  In this case, the rest of it-- “Conference on Minorities, Federalism and Politics in Nigeria, in honor of Professor G.N. Hembe, 15-18 July 2012” -- would be the statement of responsibility, right?  It cannot be “other title information” because it is a named conference and a conference is an entity.

 

Alternatively, could one do this, such that the title is the entire text of the title page?

 

245 10  Book of abstracts, Conference on Minorities, Federalism and Politics in Nigeria, in honor of Professor G.N. Hembe, 15-18 July 2012.

 

What I most commonly see in bibliographic records is like this:

 

245 10  Book of abstracts : $b Conference on Minorities, Federalism and Politics in Nigeria, in honor of Professor G.N. Hembe.

This is not correct, is it?

 

In other examples, the title page may have the name of the conference on the top, followed by a word such as Proceedings in large lettering.  This is the same kind of situation, where the title proper is either simply the word “Proceedings,” OR, the entire statement such as “International Conference on Blah, Blah, held in XYZ on abc date, Proceedings.”

 

But a patron isn’t going to think about a conference name as an author.  He is going to search for it as title words.  What guidance does anyone have? 

 

Thanks a lot,

 

Louise

 

Louise Ratliff

Social Sciences and Map Catalog Librarian

UCLA Cataloging & Metadata Center

11020 Kinross Ave., Box 957230

Los Angeles, CA 90095-7230

1-310-206-5853