Print

Print


Thanks, Adam,

I wasn't sure whether $f in the 4XXs would be legitimate.

Wayne 

-----Original Message-----
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Adam L. Schiff
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 1:08 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Expressions of 2 diff works with same translated title

Wayne,

The 4XXs do not HAVE to be differentiated from each other, but you may if you consider it important for identification.  If the dates of expression are different, I think that seems like the easiest element to use to differentiate them.  add $f with date to each 4XX

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
[log in to unmask]
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Wayne Richter wrote:

> I have a situation where there are two completely different works (with different titles) by the same author with the same translated title. In creating the NAR there shouldn't be any problem with 4XXs matching but should there be another way to distinguish them?  The original works are VERY different: one is a multi-volume comprehensive history of a specific period and the other is a very brief pictorial overview of the entire history such as might be found in a short encyclopedia entry. In addition to the different original titles the 046 $ks would be different.
>
> Should I just leave the 2 NARs with matching 4XXs or should I try to distinguish them further? RDA NARs make it pretty clear the expressions represent 2 different works.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Wayne Richter
> Asian Materials Specialist/PCC Liaison The Libraries Western 
> Washington University Bellingham, WA 98225-9103 ALCTS CC:AAM
>
> Maybe I'm just overthinking the plumbing. Beam me up, Scotty.
>