This is similar to my reply to Nate's question about how to deal with 
non-URI identifiers: that BIBFRAME could mint URIs for those 
identifiers. The identifiers would clearly be marked as having been 
minted as part of BIBFRAME (coming under an or DNS, 
as you suggest). This way no one has to deal with non-standard 
identifier forms, and LC has control over its own data environment.


On 8/3/13 9:33 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> For maintaining Bibframe's independence, I'd suggest using ISBN URIs 
> under, such as  , 
> etc.
> This would also solve the challenge that publisher's notion of ISBNs 
> regarding the current status of their world wide book supply chains 
> are not necessarily the same as in Bibframe based catalogs, which are 
> out of publisher's responsibilities.
> Jörg

Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask]
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet