Thanks, Rebecca. Do you know if either of these could be used in
non-subject situations?
kc
On 8/21/13 12:56 PM, Guenther, Rebecca wrote:
>
> There are 2 of these that have a subject relationship:
>
> depicted
>
> setting (this one is new and was added in 2013):
>
> Setting [stg]
>
> An entity in which the activity or plot of a work takes place, e.g. a
> geographic place, a time period, a building, an event
>
> Rebecca
>
> *From:*Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Karen Coyle
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 21, 2013 3:28 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: [BIBFRAME] Authority - Treatment of role data
>
> Thanks, Mac - I wasn't thinking about people as subjects, but that
> adds an interesting twist. The section in the document on subject
> authorities doesn't address this. I wonder if there are relators that
> can be applied to a person (or corporate body) as either a subject or
> an "agent" (creator, producer, etc.). Unfortunately, the note that
> indicates that:
>
>
> · Editorial Notes
>
> * Subject relationship
>
>
> doesn't show on the file downloads, so I don't see an easy way to find
> out how many there are.
>
> kc
>
> On 8/21/13 10:19 AM, J. McRee Elrod wrote:
>
> This is less of a question for subjects since there is only one
>
> relationship there ...
>
>
>
> Not in our experience. In cataloguing an etching collection, we had
>
> "$edepicted" on subject headings for people, buildings, places, etc.
>
>
>
> This relationship differs from "about" which is understood as opposed
>
> to having a MARC relator code, or an RDA relator term.
>
>
>
> The authority for the person/thing/whatever must exclude role, with
>
> role being another element. The same person may for three or more
>
> roles in relation to a resource, e.g., the writer/director/actor of/in
>
> film.
>
>
>
>
>
> __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>)
>
> {__ | / Special Libraries CataloguingHTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
>
> ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
>
>
>
> --
> Karen Coyle
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> http://kcoyle.net
> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet
--
Karen Coyle
[log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
