Error during command authentication.
Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.
The PCC guidelines on relationship designator so says not to use designator a from Appendix I in name/title added entries. Adam Schiff U of Washington On Wed, 6 Nov 2013, Wilson, Pete wrote: > Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 22:28:41 +0000 > From: "Wilson, Pete" <[log in to unmask]> > Reply-To: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: 700 name/title work entries that include relationship designators > > I'm curious about what seems a strange combination of name-title work AAP and relationship designators. > > This is from LC's record 2013-361481: > > 700:12: Berengo-Gardin, Gianni, $e photographer. $t Works. $k Selections. > > Is the use of the relationship designator appropriate here? It looks funny to me. > > Philosophically it seems that we are using this field awkwardly for two purposes. The relationship designator expresses the relationship of Berengo-Gardin to the manifestation. The field as a whole, minus the relationship designator, records a work contained in the manifestation. > > Would it be better to use two separate fields? Or is the relationship designator simply unnecessary? > > In this case, by the way, the book is entered under title. It is an exhibition catalog. The only other 7xx field is for the "editor of compilation." > > Would love to hear what you think. Thanks! > > Pete Wilson > Vanderbilt University > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Adam L. Schiff Principal Cataloger University of Washington Libraries Box 352900 Seattle, WA 98195-2900 (206) 543-8409 (206) 685-8782 fax [log in to unmask] http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~