Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Print

---

The PCC guidelines on relationship designator so says not to use designator a from Appendix I in name/title added entries.

Adam Schiff
U of Washington



On Wed, 6 Nov 2013, Wilson, Pete wrote:

> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 22:28:41 +0000
> From: "Wilson, Pete" <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: 700 name/title work entries that include relationship designators
> 
> I'm curious about what seems a strange combination of name-title work AAP and relationship designators.
>
> This is from LC's record 2013-361481:
>
> 700:12: Berengo-Gardin, Gianni, $e photographer. $t Works. $k Selections.
>
> Is the use of the relationship designator appropriate here?  It looks funny to me.
>
> Philosophically it seems that we are using this field awkwardly for two purposes.  The relationship designator expresses the relationship of Berengo-Gardin to the manifestation.  The field as a whole, minus the relationship designator, records a work contained in the manifestation.
>
> Would it be better to use two separate fields?  Or is the relationship designator simply unnecessary?
>
> In this case, by the way, the book is entered under title.  It is an exhibition catalog.  The only other 7xx field is for the "editor of compilation."
>
> Would love to hear what you think.  Thanks!
>
> Pete Wilson
> Vanderbilt University
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
[log in to unmask]
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~