 |
 |
RDA 6.2.2.10.2 gives us leeway to select "an appropriate specific collective title." If the assembled Berengo-Gardin works are all photographs, then using "$t Photographs. $k Selections" seems specific and appropriate. I could see including the $e in a relationship statement to express the relationship between Berengo-Gardin and the work per RDA 18.5; but that's different. The name that appears in the authorized access point is just that--part of the work's access point, and not generally the preferred place to express the relationship. Though there appear to be exceptions. The MARC21 Authority Format includes "$e defendant" in the name/title access point for a court case as an example of using $e (cf. Names and Terms--General Information/X00, $e). Stephen On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Wilson, Pete <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > Honestly I don’t know—I am still a little boggled by the new > “works/selections” approach to art. I gather you are agreeing that the > relationship designators should not be included in the work authorized > access point, though? > > > > Pete Wilson > > Vanderbilt University > > > > *From:* Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto: > [log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Hearn > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 06, 2013 5:33 PM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: [PCCLIST] 700 name/title work entries that include > relationship designators > > > > Is "700:12: Berengo-Gardin, Gianni. $t Photographs. $k Selections." an > option? > > > > Stephen > > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:07 PM, John Wright <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Yes, it seems that an error was made and this would best be presented as > two separate 700 fields as follows: > > > > 700:1 : Berengo-Gardin, Gianni, $e photographer. > > > > 700:12: Berengo-Gardin, Gianni. $t Works. $k Selections. > > > > *From:* Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto: > [log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of *Wilson, Pete > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 06, 2013 3:29 PM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* 700 name/title work entries that include relationship > designators > > > > I’m curious about what seems a strange combination of name-title work AAP > and relationship designators. > > > > This is from LC’s record 2013-361481: > > > > 700:12: Berengo-Gardin, Gianni, $e photographer. $t Works. $k Selections. > > > > Is the use of the relationship designator appropriate here? It looks > funny to me. > > > > Philosophically it seems that we are using this field awkwardly for two > purposes. The relationship designator expresses the relationship of > Berengo-Gardin to the manifestation. The field as a whole, minus the > relationship designator, records a work contained in the manifestation. > > > > Would it be better to use two separate fields? Or is the relationship > designator simply unnecessary? > > > > In this case, by the way, the book is entered under title. It is an > exhibition catalog. The only other 7xx field is for the “editor of > compilation.” > > > > Would love to hear what you think. Thanks! > > > > Pete Wilson > > Vanderbilt University > > > > > > -- > > Stephen Hearn, Metadata Strategist > > Technical Services, University Libraries > > University of Minnesota > > 160 Wilson Library > > 309 19th Avenue South > > Minneapolis, MN 55455 > > Ph: 612-625-2328 > > Fx: 612-625-3428 > -- Stephen Hearn, Metadata Strategist Technical Services, University Libraries University of Minnesota 160 Wilson Library 309 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55455 Ph: 612-625-2328 Fx: 612-625-3428