Yes, 18.5 speaks of the �resource,� not the �work,� so a relationship designator applied on the basis of that rule in a name access point shows the relationship of the name to the resource, not the work embodied in it (or the work that is one of several embodied in the resource).� It seems to me a stretch to include a relationship designator in a name-title AAP for a work in order to show the name�s relationship to the work.
�
Stephen, how do you feel about John Wright�s suggestion to make two different access points, one for the work (without $e) and one for the contributor to the resource (with $e)?
�
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stephen Hearn
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 9:08 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] 700 name/title work entries that include relationship designators�
RDA 6.2.2.10.2 gives us leeway to select "an appropriate specific collective title." If the assembled Berengo-Gardin works are all photographs, then using "$t Photographs. $k Selections" seems specific and appropriate.�
�
I could see including the $e in a relationship statement to express the relationship between Berengo-Gardin and the work per RDA 18.5; but that's different. The name that appears in the authorized access point is just that--part of the work's access point, and not generally the preferred place to express the relationship.
�
Though there appear to be exceptions. The MARC21 Authority Format includes "$e defendant" in the name/title access point for a court case as an example of using $e (cf. Names and Terms--General Information/X00, $e).
�
Stephen
�
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Wilson, Pete <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Honestly I don�t know�I am still a little boggled by the new �works/selections� approach to art. �I gather you are agreeing that the relationship designators should not be included in the work authorized access point, though?
�
Pete Wilson
Vanderbilt University
�
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stephen Hearn
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 5:33 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] 700 name/title work entries that include relationship designators�
Is "700:12: Berengo-Gardin, Gianni. $t Photographs. $k Selections." an option?
�
Stephen
�
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:07 PM, John Wright <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Yes, it seems that an error was made and this would best be presented as two separate 700 fields as follows:
�
700:1 : Berengo-Gardin, Gianni, $e photographer.
�
700:12: Berengo-Gardin, Gianni. $t Works. $k Selections.
�
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wilson, Pete
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 3:29 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: 700 name/title work entries that include relationship designators�
I�m curious about what seems a strange combination of name-title work AAP and relationship designators.
�
This is from LC�s record 2013-361481:
�
700:12: Berengo-Gardin, Gianni, $e photographer. $t Works. $k Selections.
�
Is the use of the relationship designator appropriate here?� It looks funny to me.
�
Philosophically it seems that we are using this field awkwardly for two purposes.� The relationship designator expresses the relationship of Berengo-Gardin to the manifestation.� The field as a whole, minus the relationship designator, records a work contained in the manifestation.�
�
Would it be better to use two separate fields?� Or is the relationship designator simply unnecessary?
�
In this case, by the way, the book is entered under title.� It is an exhibition catalog.� The only other 7xx field is for the �editor of compilation.�
�
Would love to hear what you think.� Thanks!
�
Pete Wilson
Vanderbilt University
�
--
Stephen Hearn, Metadata Strategist
Technical Services, University Libraries
University of Minnesota
160 Wilson Library
309 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
Ph: 612-625-2328
Fx:�612-625-3428
�
--
Stephen Hearn, Metadata Strategist
Technical Services, University Libraries
University of Minnesota
160 Wilson Library
309 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
Ph: 612-625-2328
Fx:�612-625-3428