Print

Print


Hi Tom,

I bought some of these a few years ago for a radio station.  Part of 
how the original worked is that the fabric underneath the "bristles" 
was absorbent.  That made it possible to dry the disc and keep the 
proper humidity for picking up dirt from the grooves.  The new fabric 
frequently is not absorbent.  The hole in the handle for storing the 
fluid is also MIA.  The current D4 seems not as effective as well.  I 
used to refill the bottles with more effective third party fluid.

No experience with new Zerostats

Bob Cham



>Hi Stewart:
>
>Not doubting you, but what do you mean? Have you also tried the new 
>version of the ZeroStat? Does it work differently too?
>
>-- Tom Fine
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Stewart Gooderman" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2013 3:33 PM
>Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Discwasher D4, still made, under "RCA" "brand"
>
>>This product seems to only share the name of the original product. 
>>It doesn't work the way the original product did.
>>
>>DrG
>>
>>On Dec 21, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.amazon.com/RCA-RD-1006-Discwasher-Record-System/dp/B000KMZKTO/tomslinx
>>>
>>>I still have my original D3, which is well worn and thus used as a 
>>>first pass (with generous helping of distilled water) for very 
>>>dirty non-valuable records. I also have an original D4, which is a 
>>>touchup cleaner for the workshop turntable.
>>>
>>>-- Tom Fine
>>
>>
>
>!DSPAM:639,52b6120c8982799630413!