Print

Print


Hi Duane:

Agreed that the Spin-Clean is not on par with something like a VPI.

So what are your recommendations "for less money"?

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "H D Goldman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] WSJ article on vinyl playbackl equipment


> With respect to your comments concerning phonograph record cleaning ...
>
> For less money, there are audibly superior materials & methods available for cleaning phonograph 
> records than a device based on re-using an increasingly contaminated bath & a cleaning formulation 
> with limited ability to remove the contaminants routinely found on new & used records.
>
> Most of us don't re-use the water we use to bathe, clean our teeth or wash our clothes & dishes. 
> Why would it be ok for phonograph records.
>
> Duane Goldman
>
> On Mar 15, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> One other comment about this "starter" vinyl system. It will definitely produce far superior 
>> sound to vintage record-wreckers, anything sold by "Crosley" and most other catalog-sold 
>> self-contained "record players." If any listmembers or their friends/family are considering 
>> plungeing into vinyl (it'll be a deep dive before you're done, be forewarned!), I recommend the 
>> following:
>>
>>
>> -- Tom Fine
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Ramm" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 11:04 AM
>> Subject: [ARSCLIST] WSJ article on vinyl playbackl equipment
>
>
> H D Goldman Lagniappe Chemicals Ltd.
> PO Box 37066 St. Louis, MO 63141 USA
> v/f 314 205 1388 [log in to unmask]
>
>