Print

Print


I say again, this is a silly thing to get exercised about. I don't pay any attention to subject 
lines once a thread gets going. People who must have a super-accurate subject line are asking too 
much of others. If they scold about it, they then are annoying others, so who's being more rude?

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sam Brylawski" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Comment on accurate subjkect lines Re: [ARSCLIST] New Yorker Article on 
Patrick Feaster and Carl Haber


> You're right, I'm sure, Lou. I don't think it's a sin and feel bad that
> Doug. P. felt that I was pointing a finger at him and did a mea culpa.
> (Sorry, Doug!) I was responding to Tom F. who said the reminders were like
> "mommies."
>
> There are good practices to try to follow. I'm sure Tom agrees, if not on
> subject lines, then some other nice practice. Sorry if I came across as
> shrill or hectoring.
>
> Sam
>
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> San and Dennis apparently do not practice what they preach!
>>
>> I find occasional wandering actual topics under a single subject sometimes
>> amusing, some times very annoying.
>>
>> Rules is rules, and people is people!
>>
>> :^)
>> Lou Judson
>> Intuitive Audio
>> 415-883-2689
>>
>> On May 23, 2014, at 9:32 AM, Dennis Rooney wrote:
>>
>> I agree with Sam on this matter. To do otherwise leads to slovenliness and
>> confusion.
>>
>> DDR
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Sam Brylawski <[log in to unmask]
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > I'm with Steve Ramm here. Editing a subject line to reflect the content
>> of
>> > the post is easy and standard email etiquette, a courtesy to those like
>> > Steve and me who choose what and when to read based on the topic posted.
>> > Also, I like chamber music.
>> >
>> > Sam Brylawski
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]
>> >> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Steve:
>> >>
>> >> One man's opinion, but I find "subject line mommies" way more annoying
>> > and
>> >> obnoxious than generic or "un-related" subject lines. Please give it a
>> >> rest. You are obviously changing no one's behavior. Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> -- Tom Fine
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Ramm" <[log in to unmask]>
>> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> >> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 4:19 PM
>> >> Subject: [ARSCLIST] New Yorker Article on Patrick Feaster and Carl Haber
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Just home from NC and scanned the subjects - Saw Dog Pomeroy's post
>> > under
>> >>> subject "[ARSCLIST] ARSCLIST Digest - 16 May 2014 to 17 May 2014
>> >>> (#2014-133)
>> >>> "
>> >>>
>> >>> Which of course - tells us nothing (the header). Since Dave Lewis
>> > replied
>> >>> using the same subject - and since others may have missed it because of
>> >>> the
>> >>> "header" - I'm copying it below.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Steve
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ____________________________________
>> >>> From: [log in to unmask]
>> >>> Reply-to: [log in to unmask]
>> >>> To:  [log in to unmask]
>> >>> Sent: 5/18/2014 7:05:25 P.M. Eastern Daylight  Time
>> >>> Subj: Re: [ARSCLIST] ARSCLIST Digest - 16 May 2014 to 17 May 2014
>> >>> (#2014-133)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> To all:
>> >>>
>> >>> I just got home from North Carolina and  haven't had time to read it
>> > yet,
>> >>> but I notice the current New Yorker (May  19) includes an article "A
>> > Voice
>> >>> From The Past" about Carl Haber, IRENE and  Patrick Feaster!
>> >>>
>> >>> Starts on page 50.
>> >>>
>> >>> To say this is  unusual is surely the understatement of the year.
>> >>>
>> >>> Doug Pomeroy
>> >>> Audio  Restoration and Mastering Services
>> >>> 193 Baltic St
>> >>> Brooklyn,  NY  11201-6173
>> >>> (718) 855-2650
>> >>> [log in to unmask]
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 1006 Langer Way
>> Delray Beach, FL 33483
>> 212.874.9626
>>
>
>