 |
 |
Tom, how do you feel when you are searching an archive and cannot find something on the topic you want, say, "scratchy records" and never knew that there were a hundred messages about that under the topic, "old record players"? Just a made-up example. But in real time following a list, who cares? There are many sides to the argument, but complaining is just a whine. No information here, folx, please move along. Who's annoying whom? Who's the scold? :-) Lou Judson Intuitive Audio 415-883-2689 On May 26, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Tom Fine wrote: I say again, this is a silly thing to get exercised about. I don't pay any attention to subject lines once a thread gets going. People who must have a super-accurate subject line are asking too much of others. If they scold about it, they then are annoying others, so who's being more rude? -- Tom Fine ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sam Brylawski" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 11:02 PM Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Comment on accurate subjkect lines Re: [ARSCLIST] New Yorker Article on Patrick Feaster and Carl Haber > You're right, I'm sure, Lou. I don't think it's a sin and feel bad that > Doug. P. felt that I was pointing a finger at him and did a mea culpa. > (Sorry, Doug!) I was responding to Tom F. who said the reminders were like > "mommies." > > There are good practices to try to follow. I'm sure Tom agrees, if not on > subject lines, then some other nice practice. Sorry if I came across as > shrill or hectoring. > > Sam > > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Lou Judson <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> San and Dennis apparently do not practice what they preach! >> >> I find occasional wandering actual topics under a single subject sometimes >> amusing, some times very annoying. >> >> Rules is rules, and people is people! >> >> :^)