Print

Print


It's a compilation of expressions, and following LC PPC PS 6.27.3, the
proper structure is just as you indicate:

100 [AAP for creator], $e author.
--no 240----
70012 $i contains (expression):$a [AAP]
70012 $i contains (expression):$a [AAP]. $l [language of translation]

When in doubt, remember the "El cartero" example from the PS (though it
would be nice if they'd update that with relational terminology).

I hope that helps.

B


On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ian Fairclough <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>  PCCLIST readers,
>
>
>
> In hand is a book for which a bib record (coded 040e rda) has these MARC
> fields:
>
> 100
>
> 240  ǂk Selections
>
> 700 ǂt ǂk Selections.
>
> 700 ǂt ǂk Selections. ǂl English.
>
>
>
> But now, with two 700 fields (one for the work, one for the expression), I
> wonder whether the 240 is necessary or required.  In AACR2 cataloging, it
> would have had ǂk Selections.
>
>
>
> In case someone wants details, the record is OCLC 853452562.  Unless I
> hear to the contrary, I'll delete field 240.
>
>
>
> Sincerely - Ian P.S. the record isn't coded pcc (but looks like it
> woulda/coulda/shoulda been)
>
>
>
> Ian Fairclough
>
> Cataloging and Metadata Services Librarian
>
> George Mason University
>
> 703-993-2938
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>



-- 

Bob Talbott
Hebraica Cataloger
UC Berkeley
250 Moffitt
Berkeley, CA 94720

We're happy as fish,
as gorgeous as geese,
and wonderfully clean in the morning.