Hi Ray,

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Denenberg, Ray <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> One can say that
> is an identifier, and by definition it is, but
> I don't believe it is an identifier in the context of the discussion we
> are having.  We've been talking about non-URI identifiers, that have a
> scheme, and can (in some/most/all ?) case be turned into URIs (http or
> otherwise).

Are you agreeing, then, that the provenance of URIs (of any URI scheme) is
out of scope?