[log in to unmask]" type="cite">
I have exactly the same concern with the proposed schema.org Identifier as with the bibframe Identifier.
If <http://bowker.com/identifiers/isbn/9780553479430> is an identifier for a resource X,
and <http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/38264520> is also an identifier the same resource X,and <http://bowker.com/identifiers/isbn/9780553479430> is a schema:Identifier,and <http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/38264520> is a schema:Book,
then resource X is both a schema:Book and a schema:Identifier at the same time.
Which is clearly nonsense.
Basically ... don't do that. Please.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Mark K. Ehlert <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Young,Jeff (OR) <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
For those who can't read Jeff's response, here it is:
Richard wrote up the https://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Identifier, but I don't remember much discussion of it.
The abandoned "info" URI effort leaves me skeptical that non-HTTP URIs can be systematically described in general. I'm also skeptical that individual identifiers of any kind need to be described inline with instance data.
Rob SandersonTechnology Collaboration FacilitatorDigital Library Systems and ServicesStanford, CA 94305
-- Karen Coyle [log in to unmask] http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet