Here you have one example of what you say; in this case it’s not Little Library but Semium Time Vocabulary



Francisca Hernández



[log in to unmask]



-----Mensaje original-----
De: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum [mailto:[log in to unmask]] En nombre de [log in to unmask]
Enviado el: jueves, 10 de julio de 2014 20:04
Para: [log in to unmask]
Asunto: Re: [BIBFRAME] Bibframe and Linked Data (Authorities)


No, it does not!


We need to distinguish carefully between the URI, which is a pure identifier, and the URI-that-happens-to-be-an-URL, which is also a pointer or link. Much of the power of linked data comes precisely from combining those roles, but that needs to be a conscious decision and not a matter of faith. {grin}


Let's say that a very small institution publishes a number of URIs like "". Then Little Library disappears as an organization, and its domain is purchased by someone else. It becomes instantly possible for that someone else to publish anything at all into that namespace and, if we base provenance on the DNS, we have no way to distinguish these groups of identifiers. You might say that VIAF is unlikely to disappear tomorrow, and that's true, but the point is that relying on domain name registrars to manage the provenance information of our metadata would be an accident waiting to happen.



A. Soroka

The University of Virginia Library


On Jul 10, 2014, at 1:40 PM, "Smith-Yoshimura,Karen" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


> Kevin –


> Re:

> >There's been lots of talk about provenance and the like in a global graph of data, but I feel most of those discussions rely on fairly technical mechanisms, the complexity of >which outweigh the simplicity of minting one's own URI.  (Also, the provenance statements will need their own URIs!)


> Doesn’t show the provenance is VIAF? What’s complex about this?


> Karen S-Y