I have exactly the same concern with the proposed Identifier as with the bibframe Identifier. 

If <> is an identifier for a resource X,
and <> is also an identifier the same resource X,
and <> is a schema:Identifier, 
and <> is a schema:Book,
then resource X is both a schema:Book and a schema:Identifier at the same time.

Which is clearly nonsense.

Basically ... don't do that. Please. 


On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Mark K. Ehlert <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Young,Jeff (OR) <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


For those who can't read Jeff's response, here it is:

Richard wrote up the, but I don't remember much discussion of it.

The abandoned "info" URI effort leaves me skeptical that non-HTTP URIs can be systematically described in general. I'm also skeptical that individual identifiers of any kind need to be described inline with instance data.


Mark K. Ehlert                 Minitex
Coordinator                    University of Minnesota
Digitization, Cataloging &     15 Andersen Library
  Metadata Education (DCME)    222 21st Avenue South
Phone: 612-624-0805            Minneapolis, MN 55455-0439

Rob Sanderson
Technology Collaboration Facilitator
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305