If that is the consensus (and such was my observation of the thread) then the marc2bibframe tool could be updated. (It seems currently to generate URI-identified resources for bf:Identifiers, not blank nodes.) Kevin et al.-- I would be happy to help with that. --- A. Soroka The University of Virginia Library On Jul 16, 2014, at 5:39 PM, "Denenberg, Ray" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I think the advice is: > (1) don't use a URI to identify a bf:Identifier. Treat it as a blank node. > (2) Only a non-URI identifier (e.g. isbn) should be treated a bf:Identifier. (I.e. a URI should not be treated as a bf:Identifer. Thus the property bf:uri should be eliminated.) > > I think there is consensus on this, someone correct me if I’m wrong. > > Ray >