Print

Print


I need to create another series authority for a translated multi-part
edition of Lewis' Chronicles of Narnia. Looking at the ones already
established (none in RDA), I see a number of series authorities where the
title is followed directly by a language (e.g., Lewis ... $t Chronicles of
Narnia. $l Spanish -- a series published by Rayo) and a number where the $t
includes a publisher qualifier, followed by a language (e.g., Lewis ... $t
Chronicles of Narnia (HarperCollins (Firm)). $l Spanish).

RDA 6.27.3 on authorized access points for expressions instructs us to
combine "in this order":

a) AAP for the work
b) one or more terms from the following list:
   i) content type
   ii) date of expression
   iii) language of expression
      and/or
   iv) another distinguishing characteristic

It's not clear whether and how "in this order" applies to the list of terms
i-iv).  Looking at the examples, "... Babar en famille. English. Spoken
word" puts iii) language before i) content type, while all instances in the
examples of iv) terms appear after i-iii) terms when present. That could be
the result of cataloger's judgment applied without strict guidance from RDA
on the order of terms i-iv).

Some guidance is supplied by the LC-PCC PS for 6.27.3: "Identify an
expression in a language different from that of the original expression by
adding the name of the language in subfield $l to the authorized access
point for the work." Presumably "Lewis ... $t Chronicles of Narnia
(HarperCollins (Firm))" would be considered an access point for an
expression, not for a work; but note that that AAP has also been
established (for one of HarperCollins English editions), and collocation of
the series AAPs by publisher may have been intended.

Is the sequence of i-iv) terms meant to be prescriptive? Can or should a
qualifier for publisher precede a qualifier for language in cases like
this? If AAPs for some translated expressions of a work are qualified first
by publisher and others first by language, is that a problem that needs
correcting, or just a point on which catalogers' judgments may differ?

Thanks,

Stephen

-- 
Stephen Hearn, Metadata Strategist
Data Management & Access, University Libraries
University of Minnesota
160 Wilson Library
309 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
Ph: 612-625-2328
Fx: 612-625-3428
ORCID:  0000-0002-3590-1242