Print

Print


This is true. The Mercury team referred to all the 2-mic experimental recordings as "binaural" to 
separate them as a class from "stereo" 3-channel recordings. Because thrre-track tapes were lost in 
a handful of cases, the "binaural" edited master was what was used for the CD. If I remember 
correctly it's fewer than 5 cases, maybe only 1 or 2. (There are other cases where the 2-track tape 
recorded from the live 3-2 mix when the LP was cut was used, again because the 3-track master was 
lost, only a handful of those cases too).

I think, in the early stereo days, only Emory Cook consistently recorded true "binaural" tapes, in 
other words those designed to be listened to through headphones only.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Stamler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 12:14 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Accidental stereo (again)


> On 9/3/2014 2:11 PM, DAVID BURNHAM wrote:
>> Traditionally, "binaural" means designed to be listened to using head phones.  In other words, 
>> each channel is designed to reach only one ear.  Usually these recordings are made using an 
>> artificial head or a single pair of mikes spaced roughly 20cms apart with a baffle in between. 
>> Spot mikes shouldn't be employed.  It is difficult to convert such a source to a true stereo 
>> recording.
>
> All true, and this is the classic definition of "binaural". But for decades the word was 
> occasionally and loosely used to denote any two-channel recording system. Caused no end of 
> confusion.
>
> Peace,
> Paul
>
>