Print

Print


Hi Nate, Kevin,

Is there an opportunity to share a description of the rules for the marc to
bibframe mapping?  I'm sure that it could be reverse engineering from the
XQuery, but if there's an actual document that would be much easier to
understand and use.

Many thanks,

Rob


On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Trail, Nate <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> MARC 382 is currently in mapped in BIBFRAME as bf:musicMediumNote,
> concatenating subfields a,d,p.
>
> Nate
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Nate Trail
> LS/TECH/NDMSO
> LA308, Mail Stop 4402
> Library of Congress
> Washington DC 20540
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum [mailto:
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kirk-Evan Billet
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 4:44 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [BIBFRAME] Medium of performance (Music) question
>
> It's a Bibframe vocabulary question and also a syntax question. I want to
> refer back to something Karen Coyle discussed in 2009, responding to Martha
> Yee ( http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2009/07/yee-questions-9-11.html ). I'm
> calling it the "two oboes and three guitars" problem, but I'll reduce it
> down to just the 1 oboe and 1 guitar problem.
>
> For some music resource with an instrumentation of oboe plus guitar, we
> might have, in MARC:
>
> 382 0  $a oboe $n 1 $a guitar $n 1 $s 2 $2 lcmpt
>
> But in Bibframe, the following would be inaccurate:
>
> <piece for oboe and guitar> a bf:Work ;
>             bf:Title "Title of this piece for oboe and guitar" ;
>             bf:[?property] <
> http://id.loc.gov/authorities/performanceMediums/mp2013015507> ;
>             bf:[?property] <
> http://id.loc.gov/authorities/performanceMediums/mp2013015306> ;
>
> because the medium of performance is not oboe and it's also not guitar;
> it's oboe + guitar. Is there a syntax that can "wrap" these two separate
> statements together so that we're making one assertion about the work's
> medium? Alternatively, and especially since no such bf property currently
> exists (have I missed it?), is this a case where it is expected that we
> will use a non-bf vocabulary? (bf:musicMedium is included in category
> "Title information" and corresponds to MARC bib 240 $m or auth 1XX $m.)
>
> Thanks for any insights, clarifications, or corrections.
>
> Kirk-Evan Billet
>



-- 
Rob Sanderson
Technology Collaboration Facilitator
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305