Y'all ready for this? ;) [1]When is a literal property a 'somethingNote' and when is it just a 'something'?I assume (lacking previously mentioned MARC to BibFrame mapping document) that all of the Notes come from 5XX fields, which seems like something that could easily be rationalized along with some of the other properties, again assuming they're not 5XX and hence didn't get the Note moniker.For example, these two look ... well ... identical:frequency: Intervals at which the issues or parts of a serial or the updates to an integrating resource are issued.frequencyNote: Current or former publication frequency of a resource.Current notes are:
copyNote
awardNote
contentsNote
graphicScaleNote
illustrationNote
supplementaryContentNote
dissertationNote
geographicCoverageNote
languageNote
temporalCoverageNote
creditsNote
performerNote
frequencyNotenote (!)musicMediumNotefindingAidNoteAnd the following seem like they're intended to be "notes" in the more generic sense of added description by a cataloguer or other:frequencycustodialHistoryimmediateAcquisitionnotationresponsibilityStatementproviderStatement -- or are "Statements" transcriptions from the Instance?editionResponsibilitycontentAccessibility (though c.f. schema.org/accessibilityFeature)Given the discussion regarding assigners of URIs being important, it seems that creators of notes would be also important? And thus Notes could be their own class, bf:Note, with properties including value, assigner, type and so forth.Rob[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avcS0aYJ2a8 Warning: seizure inducing flashing, terrible animation, poppy 90s music, ...--Rob SandersonTechnology Collaboration FacilitatorDigital Library Systems and ServicesStanford, CA 94305