Print

Print


I think this fits in with NACO lite.

Just this week one of my staff members was discussing cataloging metadata with a music professor who specializes in jazz.  She showed her the entity attributes search in the NAF. She searched jazz musicians and pulled up 703 jazz musicians and the professor was thrilled.  When she told me the story, I thought how wonderful it would be if we opened up coding the headings information fields to the wider community, especially to those in specialized areas.  It seems like any other area of crowd sourcing.  People who really care have both the knowledge and the enthusiasm for the work.  I think many catalogers, on the other hand, see coding attributes as time consuming and not very useful.  If we could get a substantial body of this data, PCC could perhaps work on use cases.  I've heard that there is some interest in the Blacklight community to use authority data in discovery systems for example.

Kate


On 10/3/2014 11:33 AM, Beth Picknally Camden wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite"> Everyone:

It's time for one last strategic theme for discussion.   I would like us to look at Recommendation 3 for the ACI report:  "Significantly expand the ranks of those who can create
identifiers/contribute authority data".   They propose two ways of expanding:
What are the pros/cons of these options?   Should we do both, or neither?   Other thoughts on this recommendations?

-Beth
-- 
********************************************************
Beth Picknally Camden
Goldstein Director of Information Processing
University of Pennsylvania Libraries
215-746-4149            [log in to unmask]
http://bpcamden.wordpress.com/

"You must be the change you wish to see in the world".
--Mahatma Gandhi
********************************************************* 


-- 
Kate Harcourt
Director, Original and Special Materials Cataloging
102 Butler Library
Columbia University
New York, NY  10027
email: [log in to unmask]
phone: 212.854.2714