Print

Print


I wholeheartedly agree with Adam, and believe that if BibFrame is to even
begin to replace MARC, then it MUST be consumed (and hopefully also
produced) by more communities than just library cataloguers using
replacement tools for the ones they already have.

Rob

On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 6:19 AM, [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> In other words, if Bibframe is a language for discussion and information
> exchange only amongst catalogers and their professional colleagues, my
> objections to requiring inference evaporate. In that situation, I'm all in
> favor of using all technological capabilities to the fullest. If, on the
> other hand, Bibframe is a language for publishing bibliographic information
> to the wild wide Web, then Bibframe triples could be consumed by anyone and
> anything, and the assumption of inference (even given the points you make
> below) seems to me to be too much.
>