Print

Print


Hi Jörg,

Yes you understand perfectly, that is exactly my proposal :)

Rob


On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 9:57 AM, [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]
> wrote:

> do I understand it correctly? Instead of
>
> <w> a Work ;
>   bf:issn <i> .
> <i> a Identifier ;
>   rdf:value "1234567890" .
>
> we should better think about something like this?
>
> <w> a Work ;
>   bf:identifier <i> .
> <i> a ISSNIdentifier ;
>   rdf:value "1234567890" .
>
> I'd prefer the latter, instead of inflating Bibframe with concrete
> identifier properties like bf:issn, bf:isbn etc. there is just a common
> bf:identifier property.
>
(Not only for bf identifiers, this construction can be generalized).
>





-- 
Rob Sanderson
Technology Collaboration Facilitator
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305