It would seem to me that for the desires expressed below to come true, communities outside of library catalogers would need to be consulted in BIBFRAME's development.
From: Robert Sanderson <
[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <
[log in to unmask]>
Date: Monday, November 10, 2014 at 11/10/14 • 10:40 AM
To: Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative Forum <
[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [BIBFRAME] Closed and Open Assumptions was [BIBFRAME] [Topic] Types
I wholeheartedly agree with Adam, and believe that if BibFrame is to even begin to replace MARC, then it MUST be consumed (and hopefully also produced) by more communities than just library cataloguers using replacement tools for the ones they already have.