On 3/27/2015 5:46 PM, Kelley McGrath wrote:
 > I strongly disagree with the statement that  someone who understands 
MARCXML can do whatever they want with the data. I think I have a pretty 
good grasp of MARC and I have spent countless frustrating hours trying 
to get information out of MARC records (and not always succeeding).
 > Granted, I'm not a developer, but I've worked with people who are 
good developers so I don't think that's the bottleneck.
 > That said, I'm not sure that Bibframe is going to fix my problems.

[sorry, my cat walked on my keyboard and sent the message too soon!]

MARCXML is not particularly friendly to extracting some of the 
information, but it can be done nevertheless. Certainly it can be made 
easier but that doesn't mean that it can't be done. A lot of that 
information is buried in the fixed fields which are crazy, but much of 
that information is less important for the public. Besides, relatively 
few need the width of the tape is 1/4 in. (which equals value "m" in 
007/07 when 007/00 is "s"). Such information can still be extracted. 
There has been ample time (20 years or so?), plus there used to be 
money, but there is much less now.

In conjunction with the basic statement that libraries could have 
created lots of things and they haven't. Look at the other sites on the 
web, for instance, Goodreads really should have been made by libraries. 
We aleady have all the information. That was a missed opportunity.

The problems have not been format. Obviously, the problems are elsewhere.

James Weinheimer [log in to unmask]
First Thus
First Thus Facebook Page
Personal Facebook Page
Cooperative Cataloging Rules
Cataloging Matters Podcasts
The Library Herald

[delay +30 days]