 |
 |
We're currently sketching out the process and scripts for adding $0 to our (existing) Voyager records in bulk, having already done some proof-of-concept testing, and will be eager to share our discoveries. "We" is pretty much just Tech. Services staff, by the way, so we are / will be learning quite a lot. Speaking of steps that can be taken now: Has anyone incorporated the MarcEdit Link Identifiers tool into their cataloging workflows? If so, how? Peter On 04/04/2015 04:07 PM, Karen Coyle wrote: > On 4/4/15 12:27 PM, Steven Folsom wrote: >> Yes, we will be working with MARC for a while longer. I, too, hope in >> the meantime that we make strides in sanctioned additions and work >> arounds to MARC that position us for better days, e.g. more $0 URI’s >> that are dereferenceable. > Just want to note that some of the same vendors who do authority > updates will also add the appropriate URI in the $0 of the returned > record. I've been told, however, that this service is not being > requested by customers. Getting those $0's filled in would make it > possible for all library systems to produce useful schema.org markup > in their displays. It would also make any conversion to BIBFRAME or > RDA in RDF much more economical because the identifiers would already > be available. > > So, is anyone doing this? Getting the $0's filled in? Do you have info > to report from your experience? >