 |
 |
I've wished for a nice concise statement about series numbering appearing only in CIP/CIP-esque data, too, aÌ laÌ LCRI 1.6G, but since there doesn't seem to be anything in RDA or a PS that explicitly states this, I've been extrapolating LC-PCC PS 2.12.1.2 "If the series statement appears only in pre-publication cataloging data (foreign or domestic) in the item, do not transcribe this information as a series statement" plus LC-PCC PS 2.2.2.1 "Do not consider pre-publication cataloging data (foreign or domestic) appearing in the item as a source of information for transcribed elements" to equal "Ignore the series numbering if it only appears in CIP or something CIP-ish." Rich Rich Murray Catalog Librarian for Spanish & Portuguese Languages and Rare Books Duke University Libraries Durham, North Carolina, USA [log in to unmask] >-----Original Message----- >From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging >[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Yan Liao >Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 1:07 PM >To: [log in to unmask] >Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Need help with a series title > >Mark, thanks a lot. The links you provided below do cover the series >statement. In my original post, one of the question is regarding to the >numbering of the series. In the case that I have, the CIP shows the >numbering as 1, which doesn't show up in other places. Based on RDA: >http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=rdachp2&target=rda2- >8012#rda2-8012 , it doesn't conveniently lead to CIP data cannot be used >as good source. Thus, I wonder whether that part can also be added to >the source of info for the numbering of series. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging >[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ehlert, Mark K. >Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:42 PM >To: [log in to unmask] >Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Need help with a series title > >From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging >[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Yan Liao >> >> (As Stephen mentioned, CIP data may not be a good source of info. I >> agree, >> BTW: should the doubt about using CIP data as source info be added to >> the LC-PCC document? It's not clear for now based on the current rule) > > >Is this what you're looking for? ><http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=lcpschp2&target=lcps2- >2202#lcps2-2202> ><http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=lcpschp2&target=lcps2- >2442#lcps2-2442>