Print

Print


I've wished for a nice concise statement about series numbering appearing only in CIP/CIP-esque data, too, a la LCRI 1.6G, but since there doesn't seem to be anything in RDA or a PS that explicitly states this, I've been extrapolating LC-PCC PS 2.12.1.2 "If the series statement appears only in pre-publication cataloging data (foreign or domestic) in the item, do not transcribe this information as a series statement" plus LC-PCC PS 2.2.2.1 "Do not consider pre-publication cataloging data (foreign or domestic) appearing in the item as a source of information for transcribed elements" to equal "Ignore the series numbering if it only appears in CIP or something CIP-ish."

Rich


Rich Murray
Catalog Librarian for Spanish & Portuguese Languages and Rare Books
Duke University Libraries
Durham, North Carolina, USA
[log in to unmask]



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Yan Liao
>Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 1:07 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Need help with a series title
>
>Mark, thanks a lot. The links you provided below do cover the series
>statement. In my original post, one of the question is regarding to the
>numbering of the series. In the case that I have, the CIP shows the
>numbering as 1, which doesn't show up in other places. Based on RDA:
>http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=rdachp2&target=rda2-
>8012#rda2-8012 , it doesn't conveniently lead to CIP data cannot be used
>as good source. Thus, I wonder whether that part can also be added to
>the source of info for the numbering of series.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ehlert, Mark K.
>Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:42 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Need help with a series title
>
>From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Yan Liao
>>
>>  (As Stephen mentioned, CIP data may not be a good source of info. I
>> agree,
>> BTW: should the doubt about using CIP data as source info be added to
>> the LC-PCC document? It's not clear for now based on the current rule)
>
>
>Is this what you're looking for?
><http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=lcpschp2&target=lcps2-
>2202#lcps2-2202>
><http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=lcpschp2&target=lcps2-
>2442#lcps2-2442>