 |
 |
Mark, thanks a lot. The links you provided below do cover the series statement. In my original post, one of the question is regarding to the numbering of the series. In the case that I have, the CIP shows the numbering as 1, which doesn't show up in other places. Based on RDA: http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=rdachp2&target=rda2-8012#rda2-8012 , it doesn't conveniently lead to CIP data cannot be used as good source. Thus, I wonder whether that part can also be added to the source of info for the numbering of series. -----Original Message----- From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ehlert, Mark K. Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:42 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] Need help with a series title From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Yan Liao > > (As Stephen mentioned, CIP data may not be a good source of info. I > agree, > BTW: should the doubt about using CIP data as source info be added to > the LC-PCC document? It's not clear for now based on the current rule) Is this what you're looking for? <http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=lcpschp2&target=lcps2-2202#lcps2-2202> <http://access.rdatoolkit.org/document.php?id=lcpschp2&target=lcps2-2442#lcps2-2442> -- Mark K. Ehlert O'Shaughnessy-Frey Library Cataloging and Metadata University of St. Thomas Librarian 2115 Summit Avenue Phone: 651-962-5488 St. Paul, MN 55105 <http://www.stthomas.edu/libraries/> "Experience is by industry achieved // And perfected by the swift course of time"--Shakespeare, "Two Gentlemen of Verona," Act I, Scene iii