So who makes the grooved disk EQ you guys are using that makes the phase corrections? Is that phase issue now a phantom menace? -- Tom Fine ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Pomeroy" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 10:23 AM Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Playing Edison Diamond discs > Tom, > > Just for the record, I like analog, but I use EQ in the digital domain all the time (in it's > analog version, > which includes phase correction). > > I find the accuracy and repeatability of computer based EQ a positive benefit. The eye helps the > ear. > > Doug > > On May 11, 2015, at 12:00 AM, ARSCLIST automatic digest system wrote: > >> >> Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 14:07:20 -0400 >> From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]> >> Subject: Re: Playing Edison Diamond discs >> >> Hi Jamie: >> >> I agree with most of what you're saying, but guys like Doug Pomeroy, who have a long track record >> of >> making excellent-sounding remasters from disks can read chapter and verse why doing EQ in the >> digital domain doesn't work as well. See Gary Galo's article in ARSC Journal, too. That said, I'm >> not averse to taking something back out to analog, I've always had good luck with it, so I don't >> see >> that as taboo (ie do what you suggest -- a flat transfer and your 45/45 processing in the digital >> realm, but then I'd take it back out to analog for proper de-emphasis EQ). I also don't think >> it's >> possible to totally remove surface noise and, in the case of heavily damaged grooves, all the >> ticks >> and pops without serious, horribly audible digital artifacts. So going for "total removal of the >> disk medium" is a fool's errand, there comes a point where what's left is too thin sounding or >> inherently distorted so it's more annoying tham some surface noise masking the harsh distortion. >> The >> worthy goal that you're espousing, using modern digital tools, is to get as much music content >> out >> of the grooves and cancel out as much noise as possible. >> >> By the way, the description you wrote "the stylus is unyielding and gouges its way through pinch >> effect" exactly describes such record-wreckers as the GE variable reluctance cartridge. Those >> kinds >> of cartridges (including the cheapo 3-gram trackers included in the console systems) cored out >> the >> grooves on many a 1950's and 60's mono record, making them not worth buying even in the dollar >> bins >> at record stores. >> >> -- Tom Fine >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Jamie Howarth" <[log in to unmask]> >> To: <[log in to unmask]> >> Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 6:27 PM >> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Playing Edison Diamond discs >> >> >>> I think what frustrates the discussion is that digital it is possible to exactly duplicate what >>> you >>> are achieving mechanically plus a whole lot more. >>> >>> It's not that the stylus is unyielding and gouges its way through pinch effect (one hopes). It's >>> simply not wired to communicate what it's doing in that axis. There is nothing magical about >>> 45/45 >>> coil placement that makes it suck compared to 90/0... You want to use the GE? Terrific. It still >>> moves vertically it just couples the entire mass of the tone arm and bearing to that motion >>> rather >>> than absorb it locally in the cantilever. Terrific. >>> To each his own. >>> Every iota of geometry in the groove/stylus interface can be deduced from 45/45. All of the >>> mechanical noise cancellation or the facsimile thereof achieved via wiring for 90/0 can be >>> achieved digitally, and then some. >>> I'll bet Ortofon says nothing about doing the declick and cleanup from a non-de-emphasized >>> digitization but it's a good idea before all the bass boost and treble rolloff. Do the RIAA or >>> whatever curve afterward. Slap some on in the monitor so you know what you're listening to. But >>> preserve and restore right off the cartridge. Don't bake in anything that loses information. >>> >>> Please pardon the misspellings and occassional insane word substitution I'm on an iPhone >>> > > DOUG POMEROY > Audio Restoration & Mastering Services > 193 Baltic St Brooklyn, NY 11201-6173 > (718) 855-2650 > [log in to unmask] > >